Well, it seems that
I wasn't the only one chagrined by the idea of peeing into a woman's mouth. After N.O.W. and a bunch of other organizations got invovled, Virgin Airways
cancelled their plans for a urinal designed to look like a woman's open mouth.
I disagree with the vehemence of the rhetoric printed in that article -- it IS funny. I don't think it is expressely misogonystic... I just know from my experience running this site that people would interpret it that way, just like people keep on sending me poopsex stories.
In that sense, I guess that people see in something what they WANT to see. If people have a poop fetish, they will see poopsex everywhere. If they are misogynist, they will see ways to degrade women everywhere they go. The question is: how much should their deviant beliefs be encouraged, expressly or through implication, by a society? In the case of PR, I actively discourage the erotic interpretation of these stories. But in the case of pissing into a porcelain woman's mouth, there is really no effort to discourage an antisocial interpretation of the act. So I guess that's the problem -- the subtext of the act is universally misogonystic.