In a knee-jerk reaction to academic and ecological activists, vociferous public pressure, and a pending Congressional action, backsliding revisionists at EPA
reversed their intended policy to
relax existing regulation of municipal sewage treatment facilities. If the EPA had adopted the new policy, U.S. sewage treatment plants might have avoided an estimated $90 billion or more in facility upgrades required to meet NPDES standards to eliminate or at least minimize the fecal pollution of our nation's waters.
Under the proposed policy, millions of Americans would have
faced an increased threat of bacteria, viruses, and parasites in recreational,

commercial fishing, and municipal drinking water resources from the dumping of inadequately treated sewage into our waterways anytime it rains. Under standing policy, municipalities must continue to upgrade treatment facilities to fully process wastewater except in the most extreme circumstances such as hurricanes and tropical storms.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins University have said that more than half the waterborne disease outbreaks in the United States during the last half-century
followed periods of extreme rainfall, indicating that there is a lot of harmful shit in the estimated trillion gallons annually of untreated sewage discharging from aging U.S. treatment systems.
But adequately treating sewage is an expensive process, and
the Bush administration sought to relax existing law, and allow cities and towns strapped by budgetary constraints to save money while unleashing floating turds, e. coli, hepatitis A, helminth worms, and chemical pathogens willy nilly into our rivers, lakes, and oceans.
U.S. Representatives Bart Stupak, D-Mich., E. Clay Shaw, R-Fla, Frank Palone, D-N.J., and Jeff Miller, R-Fla., offered a bill to block EPA's proposed plan. The House Bill sought to protect our nation's recreational waters and fisheries from the EPA's proposed turd terrorism. EPA backed down and reversed itself just one hour before the House passed the bill.
Tiernan Sittenfeld, legislative director for the League of Conservation Voters, which supported the House measure, said EPA's reversal is "a victory for health," and will help ensure cleaner rivers, lakes, and streams. PoopReporters who live downstream of large urban populations may wish to forward their thanks to the appropriate Representatives.