With the news that North American farmers
might soon endure a fertilizer shortage (also reported
here), I'd like to present two completely unrelated numbers:
- Farmers in the US use sixty-seven million pounds of nitrogen fertilizer every single day.
- Toilet users in the US flush 108 million pounds of poop* down the toilet every single day.
Why do I call those numbers "unrelated"? After all, the poop-educated amongst us will instantly recognize that #2 can replace #1 -- that human waste, when properly composted, makes excellent fertilizer. You know that humanity's place at the top of the food chain means we're supposed to be at the bottom, providing food for bacteria and fertilizer for plants. Can't the poop we flush grow the food we eat? Why endure a fertilizer shortage when we're flushing 108 million pounds of fertilizer down the toilet every single day?
The reason is that it's not just poop and pee arriving at the sewage treatment plant.
If sewers contained only organic waste, there wouldn't be a problem. But in addition to poop and pee, sewers contain the Drano we pour into our bathtubs and the paint we pour into our sinks. In cities with combined rainwater and wastewater sewers, they contain the oil-slicked runoff from roads and melted roadside snow turned brown from the exhaust of the cars driving past. They contain industrial and commercial waste dumped both legally and illegally. And at the sewage treatment plant, all these chemicals and metals and compounds and contaminants are concentrated with our poop and our pee into sludge.
And since it's impossible to say what's in the sludge beyond our poop and pee, it's impossible to know what will happen when all those chemicals and metals and compounds and contaminants are applied to the land.
This is why we can't just ship our sludge to the farmers and let them have at it. As smart and holistic as it would be to reinstate humanity's place at the bottom of the food chain, it may be better to shove it all in a landfill and hope it never comes back.
I say "may" because I'm not convinced one way or the other. On the one hand, you have the EPA's long and detailed rules regulating the use of sludge as fertilizer -- they do allow it, provided you abide by a number of precautions meant to keep the contaminants from moving down into the water table or up into the crops. But on the other hand, you have essays like Abby Rockefeller's seminal Civilization and Sludge, which argues that even with those rules, the contaminants in the sludge are going to outlive the farmers who maintain the land, and that they're going to come back to hurt us eventually.
So even if shortages mean farmers can't get the sixty-seven million pounds of fertilizer they need each day this spring, we can't help them out with the 108 million pounds of fertilizer we'll waste. Until we can figure out how to keep our sewers free from all but poop and pee, those two numbers may have to remain forever unrelated.
* I'll be blogging about how I arrived at the "108 million pounds of poop per day" figure in the next couple of days.