poopreport : BMnewswire :

i poop and i vote

Intelligent bathroom design: the Universal Toilet

Posted 09.11.2007 by Dave
To many of us, handicapped stalls are the most glorious achievement in restroom architecture: an area more spacious than most New York City apartments, hand bars for when you really need to bear down, and a mild taboo against use by able-bodied people that keeps it cleaner and more private than most of the other options. But few have considered the reason a handicapped stall is necessary in the first place: because normal stalls require of the user two functional legs, and functional legs are something a small but significant portion of the population lacks.

The Americans With Disabilities Act requires that public accommodations must provide accessible facilities for disabled people. This ensures a building meets the needs of every bathroom-going member of the public. But access comes at a cost: handicapped bathrooms require twice the real estate to provide the same amount of convenience. More money has to be invested in providing less utility.

And these stalls aren't exactly easy on the users, either. A wheelchair-bound bathroom-goer has to maneuver his chair back and forth into a position at which he can push his butt off the chair and onto the toilet -- not an easy thing to do when, like any able-bodied user, your biggest concern is to keep you pants from touching the floor.

Korean designers Changduk Kim and Youngki Hong have solved this problem with their Universal Toilet. Not only does it require a quarter of the space of a typical handicapped stall, but it provides a single appliance that poopers of all physical abilities can utilize.

The major cognitive breakthrough of the Universal Toilet is the reversible crapper: fully-abled users can assume the standard position facing the door, while handicapped users can easily lift off their chair and mount the throne in the backwards position. Roll up, lift off, unload, push off, roll out.

This concept should be embraced by all concerned parties -- building developers, handicapped users, and fully-abled users alike. In addition to saving money and space, the design removes the social stigma many disabled poopers feel is imposed on them by their exclusive stalls. "Disabled people," Kim and Hong say, "don't want dedicated facilities. What they really want is to live seamlessly with everyone."

The only obvious fault in this design is fairly trivial: the seat itself. Straddling that angular surface seems to promise an unusual and uncomfortable pooping experience. But everything in a design prototype like this is intentional, which means this seat must have some specific intent. I can think of two: first is that this seat design is just a focal point for criticism. With critics and bloggers focusing on this minor detail, the over-arching idea is accepted as given. Once the seat is redesigned, the critics are placated and the idea itself can move forward without resistance. (It's a trick I've learned whenever presenting work to a boss: provide an obvious flaw for them to correct so they feel like they've done their job.)

The second possibility is that the angular seat is designed to force the butt cheeks apart (as opposed to traditional seats, which squish the butt cheeks together). In this, it's possible that Kim and Hong have actually created two revolutionary toilet redesigns: the Universal Toilet, and the Butt Spreading Toilet Seat. (See related poll: Do you spread your cheeks when you sit on the toilet seat?)

Come to think of it, there may be a third revolutionary toilet redesign hidden in this Universal Toilet technology: how often do you find a public toilet with a comfortable backrest?

Show some poop support, or make a poop retort.
CaCa Doodle Doo (42) -- 09.11.2007

I can't help but think of all the poop stories where the person lets fly with a buttfull of rhea all over the back wall. What a mess that would be, especially if someone needed to have "reverse seating." GAG.

Deja Poo (612) -- 09.11.2007

That's certainly a very novel toilet design. I never would have thought about making a toilet design so that it could be mounted facing either forwards or backwards.

The devil, however, is always in the details. This crapper is still going to take up a lot of space because of the crapper door. No matter how you deal with the door, the wheel-chair bound individual has to spin the chair around in order to close the door and then spin it around once more to mount the crapper.

Also, all of the freshwater feeds are under the toilet, unlike the traditional kind that mount into the top and back of the toilet. If you need to make any adjustments to the freshwater, you have to unbolt the toilet from the floor and, most probably, replace the wax seal between the toilet output and the sewage lines.

It's a good idea, but it still needs some more engineering methinks.
_______
Yo quiero Taco Bell.

Fudgepump (366) -- 09.11.2007

Truly ingenious! (Imagine trying to execute "The Move" without functional leg muscles). The seat doesn't look all that bad at first glance - the big test would have to be a true "sit-down". I'm a bit concerned that folks with really long legs may have a clearance problem in the wall-facing position, but it's surely a great idea, NTL.
P.S. - Dave, your "intentional flaw" technique is brilliant...I'm gonna remember that one.

RoboCrap13 (346) -- 09.11.2007

If a guy is trying to shit, where does he put his pants?
Around his ankles and behind the bowlfoot?
Over the top of the bowl and behind the bowlfoot?
Strip from the waist down and hang them on the wall hook where someone will steal his wallet?

_______
You have the right to remain Silent but Deadly....

Fudgepump (366) -- 09.12.2007

Yeah, RC: I was thinking about that part of the operation also. You'll notice that there is clearance behind the bowl for the feet/pants...but now that you mention it - I guess you'd drop your drawers, sit facing 9- or 3 o'clock, then rotate around to the wall-facing position (?).

RoboCrap13 (346) -- 09.12.2007

The video on the website shows the user sliding feet first over the top of the unit.

_______
You have the right to remain Silent but Deadly....

GottaGoGirl (2615) -- 09.12.2007

Sorry, but I see MAJOR flaws. I speak from experience with my mom, who was a big gal who used a wheelchair the last 10 years of her life.

My concern would be those folks in wheelchairs who weigh somewhat more than the skinny model pictured above.

Would it really be easier, for say, a 275-lb woman in a chair, to maneuver straight forward and back like that? Women have less upper body strength than men do, and my mom, for example, had the use of only one arm. She would require side bars, and there aren't any in this design.

I'm not sure she could have done it any other way than the traditional sideways-swing/slide onto the commode from the chair. That would still require the current allotment of real estate.

So my question would be whether that bathroom is usable from the old-fashioned standpoint, for those unable to adapt to the forward-back option.

As a person with a decade's experience with helping a loved one in this arena, I'm not impressed. Yet.

poo_poo_poodio (121) -- 09.12.2007

Deja Poo makes a good point, the stall and stall doors are important parts of the equation, what needs to be done is to redesign the stall as well as the crapper so they work together. I have noticed that many a poop report is more about the stall than the actual fixture in it. (lack of doors, broken latches etc...) It seems that the toilet manufacturers design the toilets and the stall manufacturers design the stalls and the two are designs are totally disconnected from each other. It's no wonder public toilets are so uncomfortable and usually darn right gross.

_______
"Can you spare a square?"

"No, I don't have a square to spare."

Fudgepump (366) -- 09.13.2007

It's good to hear from someone with 10 years up-close experience, G3. I guess there will be problems with ANY design when it comes to accomodating EVERYONE'S needs.

Mary Queen of Scats (387) -- 09.13.2007

I saw that too GGG. My grandmother was a large woman and HAD TO HAVE sidebars to use a toilet simply because she needed a way to lift herself from the side because (as affects many heavier or elderly people) it hurt her knees to stand straight up.

And now for something completely off-topic: Does anyone else wonder how they got the model for the pictures? Do you think he's one of the inventors sons...did they see him on the street and ask if he wanted to make a quick $50...or did they have actual auditions?? I dunno why I thought of this, I just did.

_______
Man who stand on toilet seat is high on pot.

The Thunderous ... (660) -- 09.13.2007

See Im a wide guy with a wide stance.........damnnnnnn wrong post again. Seriously though thats a really great design IF and only IF the doors were taken into consideration along with any other issues. You have to admit thats a pretty good design.
_______
The Thunderous Crapper 63 Enjoying home toilet advantage since 2004!

Fudgepump (366) -- 09.14.2007

The stall door is no biggie - just something like a vertical garage door kinda thing. Maybe like some kind of venetian blind or something...all you REALLY need is a privacy screen of some type.

poo_poo_poodio (121) -- 09.14.2007

I like the roll up door concept, in a perfect world only privacy would be a consideration but in the world we are living, security is also a huge issue. Peace of mind and safety are important factors in the PPE. (Public Pooping Experience) We have all heard of purse theft or just plain hooliganism ruining a perfectly good visit to the chamber of commerce. A sturdy, easy to use door is a must in a good design.

_______
"Can you spare a square?"

"No, I don't have a square to spare."

Fudgepump (366) -- 09.18.2007

That's interesting p3: I never think in terms of "security" re: stall doors - merely privacy. But...I guess there's not a much more vulnerable position to be in than bare-assed on the can.

The Shit Volcano (3737) -- 10.09.2007

I guess I'm in too sick a mood this morning. (That happens with severe insomnia.) All I can picture is a guy trying to get out of his wheelchair onto one of these toilets, accidentally knocking the lock off his chair, which slides backward and causes him to fall on the floor and shit himself...

Okay, I'm leaving now. This has been your tasteless comment of the day. Please return to your design debate.

_______
What if everyone farted at once?

healthy 1 (1423) -- 10.09.2007

This unit looks too curvy and awkward to me. I just don't see how it benefits anyone with a disability.

The design looks more like it hinders, rather than helps the user.

The picture of the user, in the sitting position, looks more like he is reclining. Now who can successfully poop in that position?????

bathroom design (not verified) -- 06.12.2008

it's a very new bathroom design. I never would have thought about making such a bathroom design like it. I think some people can love this design

Post new comment



Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

i poop and i vote

 


About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave | Copyright 2000-2008 PoopReport.com