There's a reason tough kids smoke in them, bullies run wild in them, and geeks weigh their need to poop against the atomic wedgies that await in them: school bathrooms are no-man's land. School administrators, balancing students' privacy against students' propensity to go all
Lord of the Flies when teachers aren't looking, have to lean towards the former. Rights groups cheer, but chess club weenies quake in their double-knit reversible slacks and hope their sphincters hold out through the bumpy bus ride home.
Says Tim Byles, chief executive of England's Partnerships for Schools: "Toilets are recognized as a hotspot for bullies to threaten and intimidate others."
Don't I know it. But what can be done? The price of bathroom privacy is freedom for Metallica t-shirt-clad louts to patiently lay in wait for the next bespectacled incontinent to stumble into its den.
Unless there's a third option. Perhaps the solution to bathroom bullying -- and vandalism, and smoking, and drinking, and drug use, and sex, and turd terrorism, and whatever else punk kids get up to when grown-ups aren't looking -- lies in approaching swirlies as a design problem. This is what Byles and his associates suggest: the way to combat bathroom delinquency is to design bathrooms that promote safe pooping. Among their suggestions:
- Making hand-washing areas unisex and more visible ("unisex toilets have been shown to improve behavior and deter lingering")
- Locating bathrooms opposite classrooms so they can be more easily supervised
- Installing blurred glass walls and eliminating urinals
- Employing a full-time toilet attendant. ("A full-time toilet attendant {…} keeps them clean and maintains them to a high standard, and replenishes toilet paper and soap as required. {…} The attendant puts flowers and pictures in the toilets -- touches that pupils really appreciate.")
- "Increasing feelings of ownership by involving pupils fully in the monitoring and management of toilets"
- "Playing classical music (can calm and deter lingering)"
- In extreme cases, utilizing CCTV to monitor students. ("CCTV cameras are best used when other options have failed. The advantage with CCTV cameras is that they may allow toilets to remain open that would otherwise be locked due to fear of vandalism and misbehavior. They may also make pupils feel safer - pupils who would otherwise avoid using the toilets.")
I applaud the group once for their efforts and again for their bravery. People are virulently reactionary when confronted with change to the bathroom status quo, as the recent Sheryl Crow debacle proves; this group is certainly opening themselves up to late show ridicule in their attempt to build a better bathroom.
Some of their ideas are brilliant. Bathrooms almost always seem an afterthought in architecture, stuffed into corners as if they're a necessary evil rather than an integral part of one's experience in a building. Put them in high-traffic areas! The more people who use them, who walk by them, who see who's going in and out, the less trouble there will be.
Some of their ideas intrigue me. If bathroom terror is caused by a lack of oversight, perhaps there's merit in mixed-gender lobbies that double the traffic and soften the boundaries beyond which no authority can peer. But then again, it could just give the world's Scut Farkases a whole new gender to terrorize.
And some of their ideas worry me. Bathroom attendants and CCTV are problematic not less because I'm paranoid of salivating perverts and more because I fear the hyperreactive news media going extreme Dateline should such an outrage occur -- one incident of exploitation could set the cause of restroom reform back by decades.
England's Partnerships for Schools has set up the Bog Standard website to share their ideas and solicit comment from the community. I hereby dedicate this page to the same purpose: how can we create school bathrooms private enough for students to get their asses emptied but public enough to avoid getting their butts kicked?