poopreport : BMnewswire :

poop culture

Scatologically Correct: my op-ed in the New York Times

Posted 04.16.2007 by Dave
Seriously. The New York Times. Not only did my name just appear in The New York Times, but so did the word "poop."

I don't normally reprint articles in their entirety here on the BM Newswire, but to stimulate discussion (and stroke my ego), here it is.


SCATOLOGICALLY CORRECT
by Dave Praeger
Published: April 15, 2007

NEXT weekend, the Bronx Zoo is planning to unveil a state-of-the-art eco-friendly restroom outside its Bronx River Gate entrance. I say "unveil" because the gleaming structure, with its waterless urinals and composting toilets, was actually opened last fall; but zoo officials have been waiting until Earth Day to publicize it.

They expect to save a million gallons of water a year and recycle the composted waste of 500,000 yearly visitors as fertilizer. And while the press coverage will rightly laud the zoo for money saved, water conserved and resources recovered as part of the city's push for environmentally sound growth, the bigger issue will probably remain unexplored: what's wrong with flush toilets?

Flush toilets evolved from a luxury for the rich to a fixture mandated by New York City because of the disease cholera. Transmitted by fecal contamination of water, cholera ravaged the country -- and the world -- in the decades after the Industrial Revolution as population growth outstripped the capacity of the backyard cesspools above which privies were built. In the second half of the 19th century, medical science identified the connection between waste, water and disease; the thought was then that cholera could be prevented by flush toilets and sewers transporting waste away from the population that created it.

But many cities built their sewers in a time before science and society fully accepted the germ theory of disease. Thus, in accordance with the prevailing "filth theory," which held that running water dilutes waste into harmlessness, sewers simply channeled the accumulated waste of entire cities into the nearest waterway. This, of course, just shifted the burden of waste to downstream cities in the form of dysentery, algae blooms and insufferable stenches wafting off the water.

Eventually the government mandated sewage treatment plants to sequester solid waste and purify water before a city could discharge it. Today Americans flush about 100 million pounds of solid waste down with 32 billion gallons of water into 600,000 miles of sanitary sewers to be processed at any one of more than 16,000 publicly owned sewage treatment plants every single day.

And here is where we find what's wrong with flush toilets: they sever humanity's link in the food chain.

One animal's excrement is another animal's breakfast. This is how nature works: human and animal fecal matter is food for bacteria, which is fertilizer for plants. Humans are at the top of the food chain, but we should also be at the bottom.

So why not use the sludge captured in sewage treatment plants to replace some of the 67 million pounds of nitrogenous fertilizer farmers apply to their land every single day? Because it's not just organic waste churning through the sewers. If it were, then sludge would be a farmer's dream come true.

Sludge is also shampoo, and Drano, and paint from brushes washed in sinks, and antifreeze poured down gutters, and heavy metals and industrial waste dumped both legally and illegally. And no one knows what happens when all those contaminants are concentrated and composted and applied to the land.

Many cities and towns burn their sludge or bury it in landfills. The United States Environmental Protection Agency allows sludge to be used as fertilizer if a number of conditions, including limits on pollutants and the probability of public contact, are met to ensure that contaminants stay suspended in the soil, rather than seeping up into crops or down into ground water. But farmers are mortal and farms are ephemeral -- some day, their land will be abandoned, and those contaminants will seep as they may.

Sound familiar? For all of the lives flush toilets have saved since the time of cholera (and don't lose perspective, that number is enormous), the problem remains the same: contaminated waste seeping into the ground.

As you read about the Bronx Zoo's new bathroom this Earth Day, laud them for saving water and saving money, but cheer them even louder for keeping waste out of sewers, free from contamination and thus viable as fertilizer -- reinstating humanity's place at the bottom of the food chain, 500,000 toilet users a year.

Dave Praeger is the author of "Poop Culture: How America Is Shaped by Its Grossest National Product."


PoopReporters: I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Show some poop support, or make a poop retort.
Sally Mae (not verified) -- 04.16.2007

You're famous! Holy crap!

The Dumpster (2506) -- 04.16.2007

Where do I clean my paint brushes, then?

Toots N. McCrack (160) -- 04.16.2007

I remember I saw your previous report on this story-- and I wondered if you saw the new, state-of-the-art habitat of the gorilas at the Bronx Zoo. It's supposed to be fabulous.

And also wondering, in your expert opinion, did they change the method of flushing like you positied? The hole to put your finger inside sounded quite backwards considering that they were so forward in their thinking of the future of waste management. Did you bring that fact up to the powers that be?

_______
'Hey that sounds pretty nasty, how about a courtesy flush over there?' (AP1)

Dave (11578) -- 04.17.2007

Where do I clean my paint brushes, then?

This is the problem. Everything disappears down the hole and ends up in the same place. The task of properly managing our waste is monumental -- we need a system that properly handles wastewater, grey water, and inorganic waste like paint.

And also wondering, in your expert opinion, did they change the method of flushing like you positied?

I dunno. I haven't been back yet. The Bronx is a long way from Brooklyn...

But I doubt it. The button is standard on Clivus toilets -- I doubt the Bronx would re-engineer them.

PooperGal (527) -- 04.17.2007

Nice op-ed. It could be the beginning of a series of op-eds that take readers through the process of making poop a commodity.

I started a gardening and horticultural services business last year (picking up new customers this spring), and can see the potential of quality nightsoil to make flowers and landscape plants prosper. I can see coming up with bagged products ("Poop-in-a-Sack") to rival animal products such as "Moo Doo" and "Cock-a-Doodle-Doo," both well-selling fertilizers made from cow and chicken poop, respectively (and obviously, from their names).

So, Dave, if you get another opportunity to write for the NY Times op-ed page, maybe take the next step to talk about how poop can be made marketable. You'd have to address the issue of the stigma of human feces as fertilizer, but history has shown that people are adaptable to a lot of new ideas if you have a great marketing campaign. The Chinese have been using nightsoil for millennia, so why not the West?


_______
PooperGal
"Searching for the Origin of the Feces"

Jim Dawson (not verified) -- 04.02.2008

Does this mean that the primates at the zoo will no longer be encouraged to dispose of their shit by throwing it at visitors? What's the fun in that?

Post new comment



Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

i poop and i vote

 


About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave | Copyright 2000-2008 PoopReport.com