poopreport : BMnewswire :

make it a brown christmas

Stagnation in the sewers: what's stopping innovation in sewage treatment

Posted 06.04.2007 by Dave
By the time World War I rolled around, most American cities could boast tremendous sewer networks. Sewage treatment, however, wasn't part of the picture -- most sewers simply outflowed into the nearest waterway. And you can imagine how America's waterways stank. Congress began seriously funding sewage treatment research in the fifties, but it wasn't until the seventies when the government finally decided that a civilized society is one that manages its waste.

Since then, America has invested $250 billion into its sewage infrastructure, typically building on centralized plants based around primary and secondary treatments. And while this 1950s and 60s-era process does an adequate job of separating waste from water (and more recent tertiary treatment helps further cleanse it), this process is expensive, land-intensive, energy-hungry, and glisteningly ripe for innovation.

But there hasn't been any incentive to innovate.

It's not for lack of new ideas. Take semipermeable membranes, for instance, that use reverse osmosis to separate water from the particulates suspended in it. This system eliminates the need for settling tanks, for one thing -- dramatically reducing the land necessary for a treatment plant. But beyond semipermeable membranes are nano-particulate membrane bioreactors that add a layer of bacteria to digest organic material as it passes by. And it's hard not to get chills while reading about the solar-aquatic sewage plants that rely on bacteria, shrimp, fish, and plants to cleanse wastewater.

And those are just the ideas that make do with our current (and flawed) toilet and sewer infrastructure. The next generation of sanitary management could eliminate this expensive and unsustainable infrastructure altogether, from composting toilets to poop-powered fuel cells. Sewage treatment is indeed poised to leap into the future.

But there's little incentive for America's wastewater industry to make it move.

I learned this from Ed Clerico, president of Alliance Environmental, a consulting firm that focuses on water resource management and green building concepts. At a lecture I attended a few weeks ago, Clerico discussed water reuse in New York City. And he fascinated me with his description of an industry that seems almost explicitly designed to resist innovation.

As Ed told me then and in a later conversation, there are 16,000 wastewater entities in the US. Each one is staffed by men and women -- some elected, some appointed, some volunteers -- tasked to determine which wastewater management technology is most appropriate to staunch the estimated 80-100 gallons of water, two quarts of urine, and half pound of poop flowing inexorably from every single person in their district every single day.

But when it comes to poop, the average American is slightly less neurotic than when it comes to terror. So like a Boston bureaucrat in the face of a Lite Brite set, a wastewater decision maker lives in fear of making the wrong decision. Despite their best intentions to save money, land, and energy, a wastewater decision maker knows that if he or she embraces alternative technology and something goes wrong, it's his or her ass on the line -- and his or her driveway on which the local media will camp out. The public only cares that its poop disappears. Once that toilet flushes, no one wants to think of it ever again -- and woe betide the person who forces them to do so.

This public mandate is a tremendous disincentive to try anything new.

And the structure of the industry supports this inertia. Most of the 16,000 wastewater entities in this country are very small, responsible for towns, townships, or even individual housing developments. Because of this fragmentation, the industry relies heavily on engineering consultants. In fact, as Clerico tells me, only the very biggest wastewater entities are actually self-sufficient. Consultants drive the industry.

A cynic would note that the more capital-intensive and equipment-oriented the solution, the more money the consultant makes.

Less cynical, though, is the simple realization that business goes where money is. With demand almost entirely reserved for traditional wastewater infrastructure, there's little reason for consultants to invest in developing anything else.

Thus, though wastewater entities and wastewater consultants both surely recognize the need for innovation, the former can't demand it and the latter can't supply it.

If this were ten years ago, the story would end there. But there's a ray of sunshine bursting through the cloudy surface of the settling tank: the hope that the green building movement may extend to sewage.

Our culture is finally beginning to reevaluate waste. We're finally recognizing externalities: energy and resources consumed, and byproducts produced. And this could change the incentives driving wastewater decision makers. Soon their mandate may not be limited to sewage flowing in and water flowing out. Soon, they could be free to consider the most efficient means to that end.

This is what is necessary to break the status quo: a public demanding innovation, giving wastewater decision makers the confidence to embrace it and wastewater consultants the incentive to supply it. Because while a civilized society manages waste, an advanced society does something about it.

Show some poop support, or make a poop retort.
Anonymous Coward (not verified) -- 06.04.2007

So you blame "big business?" What else is new.

Dave (11657) -- 06.04.2007

That's a fairly narrow reading of the article.

DungDaddy (1386) -- 06.05.2007

Actually, this is top notch PoopReport material. This is what the site is about.

DungDaddy (1386) -- 06.05.2007

Going back to Coward's comment, big business is held away by the bureaucratic nature of the municipal wastewater operations. There is very little incentive for innovation in the poop business: inflexible budgets, fear of job change, protection of operators and vendors. Not to mention the fact that the shit gets deep fast if something goes wrong with a system that is being fiddled with.

I visited one of our customers who services municipal waste plants. He has a system (a component of most waste treatment operations)that is proven effective, safer, cheaper than what was the state of the art until the mid 90's. His biggest problem with the operators is that they don't want to use it beacause it would save them so much money that their budgets might be reduced. Unbelievable.

Fudgepump (366) -- 06.07.2007

"The public only cares that its poop disappears." Based on his/her one line reaction to this fine piece of reportage, I would bet that Anonymous Coward is a member of that "public." U.S. News and World Report recently ran an excellent multi-page article about the state of water availability worldwide, and I was left with the certainty that water must soon be recognized as THE essential natural resource.
One section of the article dealt with the least noticed, and most crucial, portion of the U.S.'s water infrastructure: the network of underground piping that transports the water to and from treatment facilities. I don't have the article in hand to quote from directly, but the gist of it is: nationwide, most of this network of buried pipes has been in place for 70 to 80 years now, and the estimated cost to update the system was, I believe, around $250 Billion. Coincidentally, the same amount spent since the 50's on the mostly visible wastewater treatment systems.
The only time this ticking time bomb draws any attention is the two or three times a year, usually during the winter, when we see news footage of the consequences of a ruptured 24" water main in an urban setting. Imagine overcoming the inertia and resistance to adopting state-of-the-art treatment systems if the cost and effort to rebuild the fundamental backbone of the water delivery system was thrown into the debate.

healthy 1 (1427) -- 10.06.2007

Hopefully the green building movement does have an impact on how we dispose of bodily waste.

However there are lots of barriers to overcome: A. The public's fear of poop (fecophobia), B: The incenteive of money. A more efficient system will cost less, and that will come out of someone's pocket in the end. C: The public's addiction to synthetics. If the public opted to use more eco friendly products, it would be possible to simply compost all of the poop that enteres the sewage treatment plant. D: The public's throw it away attitude.

Sooner or later, as the sewage grid ages, a major problem will arise. Then, when we are caught in the 11th hour with not means of disposing of our waste, then what?

Over the last 2 years, I have been composting 75% of my waste, and have had no problems to date. I only use organic cleaners, and household products (which are more expensive).

In the end, we as a society, need to force our government to do better on this matter. If we don't we will evenually suffer in the end.

ready to try (not verified) -- 07.20.2008

I am a member of a small village in Nebraska and we have spent a half million trying to get our sewer system to meet the State's requirements (bigger ponds, nope now they're too big, make 'em small again) and now our village of 118 is in a crisis: no way to pay back the grants and the state still won't approve our system. If they shut down our sewer we will join a host of old west ghost towns...

I'm wondering if a totally new and innovative approach to poop management would be the solution. Is there any kind of funding to be tapped into by a community willing to look at the poop after it's flushed?

Postman (369) -- 07.20.2008

Another example of how this country works. We have outdated sewage systems, failing schools, and crumbling roadways, yet the government continues to throw away billions in an unwinnable war in Iraq.

Time for this country and its people to get it's priorities straight and start taking care of problems within our own borders.

Sorry to get political, but things like this really piss me off.

ChiefThunderbutt (912) -- 07.20.2008

I am reminded of an article in "Mother Jones" some years back. To paraphrase what they said, "all pollution is, is a resource misplaced."

Poop in the drinking water is bad but composted poop in the garden is fine.

_______
Eat chilies and feel the burn!!

Squat-n-leaveit (183) -- 07.21.2008

Thou art wise Chief. Why are you not running for governor or something? Oh! That's right... Thou art wise!

Post new comment



Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

make it a brown xmas

 


About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave | Copyright 2000-2008 PoopReport.com