poopreport : BMnewswire :

oxypowder

The world desperately needs more toilets

Posted 11.10.2006 by Dave
Logjam came out of his cave today just long enough to email me this story from today's New York Times. I began a write-up, but I soon abandoned the process -- because everything I'd want to say is already said in the article.

And so, here it is.

Toilets Underused to Fight Disease, U.N. Study Finds
(login: poopreport / password: poopreport)

The toilet and the latrine, which helped revolutionize public health in New York, London and Paris more than a century ago, are among the most underused tools to combat poverty and disease in the developing world, says a United Nations report released yesterday.

"Issues dealing with human excrement tend not to figure prominently in the programs of political parties contesting elections or the agendas of governments," said Kevin Watkins, the main author of the report. "They're the unwanted guests at the table."

The human cost of that taboo, however, is more unspeakable than the topic itself, he said. Every year, more than two million children die of diarrhea and other sicknesses caused by dirty water and a lack of "access to sanitation."

That is the common euphemism for the reality that more than a third of the world's people -- 2.6 billion -- have no decent place to go to the bathroom, while more than a billion get water for drinking, washing and cooking from sources polluted by human and animal feces.

At any time, almost half the people in developing countries have one or more of the main illnesses associated with inadequate water and sanitation and fill half the hospital beds, the report said. They are plagued by diarrhea, cholera, typhoid, trachoma and parasitic worms.

The United Nations Development Program's annual attempt to measure human well-being focuses this year on the dearth of clean water and adequate sanitation for the world's poor. The report, "Beyond Poverty: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis," lays out the grim facts.

In Kibera, the sprawling slum in Nairobi, Kenya, people defecate in plastic bags that they dump in ditches or toss into the street -- a practice known as "the flying toilet." In Dharavi, the vast slum in Mumbai, India, there is only one toilet per 1,440 people -- and during the monsoon rains, flooded lanes run with human excrement.

Across the countryside in Asia and Africa, people are forced to squat in streams, backyards and fields, befouling the water they drink, the places where their children play and the plots where their food grows.

The report's authors estimate that it would cost $10 billion a year to halve the percentage of people without access to safe drinking water and to provide them with simple pit latrines. But that is less than half what rich countries spend annually on bottled water.

The report blames the governments of poor and rich countries for paying too little attention to this fundamental problem.

"Life-saving investments in water and sanitation are dwarfed by military spending," the report says. "In Ethiopia, the military budget is 10 times the water and sanitation budget -- in Pakistan, 47 times."

The report also notes that since the mid-1990s, aid from wealthy nations for water and sanitation has declined in real terms, falling to 5 percent from 8 percent of overall development aid -- "a marked contrast to education, where aid commitments doubled over the same period." Japan is by far the leader in aid for water and sanitation, providing $850 million in 2003 and 2004, a fifth of the total.

Some of the most innovative efforts to expand the availability of latrines and simple sewage systems have occurred in South Asia, the report says.

In Karachi, Pakistan, a local group began organizing slum dwellers lane by lane in 1980 to build sewer channels to collect waste from their homes. Entire neighborhoods then collaborated to construct larger channels, and the city eventually agreed to finance a trunk sewer line. The infant mortality rate in the slum, Orangi, has fallen to 40 deaths per 1,000 births, from 130 in the early 1980s.

In Bangladesh, more than 600 private groups work with communities to map the places where people defecate and the routes of disease transmission, helping to fuel demand for sanitation services. More than 3,000 small businesses have sprung up to produce, market and maintain cheap latrines.

In India, a private group called Sulabh has built thousands of public toilets and more than a million private latrines that cost as little as $10 each in more than 1,000 cities nationwide. The local authorities pay to build the public toilets, but user fees cover the costs of running them. The fee is about 2 cents, with free access for children, the disabled and the destitute.

Show some poop support, or make a poop retort.
Poopgirl (78) -- 11.10.2006


Why don't we help? It just seems wrong to leave people without a place to POOP, or DRINKABLE WATER.

Is this just me, or do you guys feel this way?

(DUH)

Poop on!

-Poopgirl

daphne (3667) -- 11.10.2006

I've heard it a million times from soldiers who've been in Iraq, "the most important piece of equipment you have besides your weapon and canteen is your little shovel. Dig a hole, dig a hole, dig a hole. No one wants to leave that around."

I guess it's for two reasons, being you can be tracked by leaving poop behind and that it's a sanitation problem at camp. But, even in temporary environments, the need to not leave it lying around is evident.

Regardless, it IS sad that there are places in this world without toilets for peope to use. They're human beings, for God's sakes. Jesus, humanity is on the rocks.


_______
.....hugging bunnies since 1969
www.daphneszoo.com

Great comment! +1 point
Bowl Clogger Blogger (71) -- 11.10.2006

Glad you asked, Poopgirl. One place you might want to go for some information about an organization that is, indeed, trying to make a difference is water4people.org. However, although we often think that drinking water and sanitation are readily available in this country, that's not always the case. Many of the Indian reservations in the continental U.S. and a substantial number of the villages in Alaska have drinking water systems that are probably unsustainable and might become non-functional over the next decade. In rural Alaska, it is still common for the "honey bucket" to be the primary form of toilet, if you consider a 5-gallon bucket that's only emptied when nearly full to be a toilet. The sanitation system in a large number of those communities consists of a lagoon where the honey buckets are dumped. Before you ask, one of the reasons they don't have outhouses is because seasonal thawing of permafrost makes them unstable, and a lot of the villages have water tables that are nearly up to ground level.
So, yes, as Daphne says, it's sad that there are places in this world that lack basic sanitation, at least insofar as it's a cause of disease. By the same token, in many countries - including the U.S. - there are both economic and cultural reasons for the lack of rudimentary sewer systems. In uncongested rural areas, it probably doesn't constitute as much of a concern as in the more crowded urban centers. Of course, the uncrowded rural areas with habitable climates are fast disappearing as the population of the planet continues its exponential growth, but still....
_______
There's a certain air about me....

Great comment! +1 point
PooperGal (527) -- 11.10.2006

I had the opportunity to travel independently in India and Nepal four times, and the one thing that really stuck in my mind's eye was the sight of women in rural India washing the family dishes and laundry in the village pond, while 15 feet away a man took an enormous dump into it.

Not just providing toilets or chemical-latrine outhouses, but also HYGIENE EDUCATION is where a chunk of our billions of dollars in overseas aid should be going.


_______
PooperGal
"Searching for the Origin of the Feces"

Great comment! +1 point
Bowl Clogger Blogger (71) -- 11.11.2006

It never hurts to educate people, but many of the folks who've attempted to inform communities in HIV hotspots around the world will tell you that there is an enormous disconnect between providing education and seeing the people put concepts into practice. We can't always appreciate in this country that what we think others should want is not always perceived as important by them. There are a ton of examples of this in areas ranging from health education to political and economic reform.

A friend of mine teaches school in a remote Alaskan village. The rate of chlamydia infection exceeds 30% in that village, and that, believe it or not, is not exceptional. Efforts by public health officials and educators to teach awareness of this and other STDs meet with a near-complete lack of response. The residents also expect that they will lose most of their teeth by their late 20's, so the children mostly disregard oral hygiene. This isn't an ethnically insensitive comment, either. It's common. We think the residents of those villages would want to save their teeth and avoid gum disease and the like, but children grow up modeling their behavior on that of their elders, and they simply don't see any value in forestalling the inevitable by trying to brush their teeth regularly.

Whether it's an Alaskan village or one in Africa, often there is very limited access to regular medical or dental care. So, it's fine to teach about the practical aspects of hygiene and disease prevention, but there are plenty of things that can happen to our bodies that even those living in modern cities can't seem to prevent. I'm not suggesting that the answer is to just give up and let people suffer in ignorance. By the same token, I am saying that we should not be surprised to see someone doing their dishes in the same pond that's used as a toilet. Other cultures just might have priorities and concerns that do not match our own. Not to get biblical on you, but you can only make the effort to preach a message; after that, you move on in search of those who are ready to hear it. br>_______
There's a certain air about me....

healthy 1 (1427) -- 11.11.2006

The worst thing that is happening in these countries is the "recycling" of their water.

These countries need a good water purification system, to purify the water of these terrible diseases.

These countries have the potential to become pioneers in waste water treatment. A system that treats the wastewater in an environmentally friendly, yet human friendly way is the best opition.

The water filtration plant should be built upstream from the villages, while the waste water plant should be built downstream.
_______
A man who farts in church, sits in his own pew.

PooperGal (527) -- 11.11.2006

BCB,
I agree. You really don't have to go far to see the disconnect. In our own communities, particularly in the inner cities and in the most rural communities, there is no more awareness of hygiene and its importance as in the Alaskan or Indian villages.

Education can't be a one-shot effort. It has to be a continuing campaign that starts with mothers and children. Of course, this is easy to say, but unless you have Bill Gates or another multi-mondo billionaire footing the bill, there will never be enough education or resources for the affected communities to really get the concept into practice. Even something as simple as not crapping where you do dishes, or washing hands after using the toilet or handling filth.

Also, it is the women who are the information bearers, and the most influential in bringing up health-conscious kids. In programs (through Peace Corps, VISTA and other service organizations) where women were given resources and training, hygiene (and sexual health/birth control/infant survival) improved far more pervasively and quickly than through any other vector.


_______
PooperGal
"Searching for the Origin of the Feces"

Bowl Clogger Blogger (71) -- 11.11.2006

No matter how much we might wish to see every person have access to safe drinking water or sanitary waste removal, we will always come up against the fundamental issue of the sustainability of any mechanical system. This isn't an engineering question; rather, it's an economic issue. Once installed, a water or wastewater system needs trained personnel, constant upkeep, and the resources to extend service to new users. Trust me, this isn't a simple problem. It's wonderful to install a well or a wastewater collection system, but having done that it's a never-ending concern regarding maintaining the system.
Enormous sums of money are required to operate even the simplest system, at least on a relative basis. A water system delivering water to a single-point collection location in a village of 100 people costs a huge amount per person to install and maintain. Unless there is a regular infusion of money for the operation of the system, it will ultimately degrade and fail. You don't just bore a well, hook up a pump, and figure that your job is done. The well will age, and contaminants such as arsenic, selenium, and a myriad of others will begin to show up in the water delivered from the well, which means periodic testing, amelioration of contaminants, treatment of the water, etc.
The Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and related regulations explicitly recognize that the "bribing" of foreign governments is a cost of doing business overseas. Why do I mention this? Because you will have to search hard and long to find governments in "developing" countries that will reliably commit funds to the maintenance of water and wastewater systems without some kind of "incentive" to do so. Where the local economy does not provide sufficient resources for the operation of drinking water and wastewater systems, all the good intentions in the world will not keep them in operation.
As I said, this is not a simple problem. We see it in our own country and we might extrapolate to the foreign models from what we've learned here. Even in our largest, most financially healthy cities, the water and wastewater facilities would not function reliably without the massive support of federal and state funding. How, then, could we expect such systems to last in countries that have huge pockets of localized subsistence economies? We couldn't. I imagine there's some appeal to the argument that "anything is better than doing nothing", but that's a whole other issue that's way beyond the scope of this comment.
_______
There's a certain air about me....

PooperGal (527) -- 11.11.2006

I don't think it has to be that technicalogical or complicated, BCB. Wastewater systems have existed in urban areas since the Roman Empire at least, and knowledge of hygiene goes back 5,000 years or more (note the command to leave the camp to crap, and to bury it, in Deuteronomy of the Hebrew Bible). You don't need a processing plant to instill knowledge and good hygiene habits in people.

A small village may see a big decrease in E. coli related illness, parasites, etc. by simply not crapping in the village pond, and by using a simple outhouse with renewable sterilizing chemicals in the pit.


_______
PooperGal
"Searching for the Origin of the Feces"

healthy 1 (1427) -- 11.11.2006

I agree PG. Excreta must be kept out of the water supply. I also believe that excreta can be re-used, if properly handled.

Take the hunza's for instance. They are one of the longest lived cultures in the world. Do they have toilets, no. The link I am about to post is what inspired me to compost humanure. www.weblife.org/humanure/chapter7_1.html

So with a little bit of education, common sense, and genius, thes disease ravaged countries can totally reverse their situation. And it can be done without a toilet, or a fancy wastewater treatment system.

The only palce that a wastewater system is parcical is in the larger cities (which are 9 times out of 10, developed anyway).
_______
A man who farts in church, sits in his own pew.

Pantload (74) -- 11.12.2006


If you are moved to help, I urge you to check out projectcure.org and contribute. We have only a 2 percent overhead so you can be assured that any contribution will get the most bang for your buck and help people that are described in this article in the most productive way. Our government just can't do it effectively however much we wish it were so under any administration. Please give it a look. We've got bedside commodes comming out our ass (so to speak) All they have to doo is dig a hole and put one over it. projectcure.org


What's so funny 'bout poop, love, and understanding?

Anomalous Coward (690) -- 11.13.2006

People are suffering in foreign countries for lack of toilets and the idiot that lives across the street from me has flowers planted in two of them in his front lawn.
Unfortunately I think that some third world governments are more interested in their own radical agendas and staying in power than their people's welfare and health. Perhaps the problem isn't too few toilets, but rather too many politicans.

PooperGal (527) -- 11.13.2006

Unfortunately, Anomalous, you are probably right. Government self-interest and corruption usurp huge amounts of aid that are supposed to help the people, the poor.

Right now, for example, billions of $ in aid are going to Sudan, courtesy of China, but instead of using it to build homes, schools and hospitals for the poor, to re-settle the homeless refugees of Darfur, or to treat the physical and psychological ailments of the victims of army violence and janjaweed atrocies, the funds are going to court a conquering outsider government guilty of genocide as tens of thousands of indigenous Africans are slaughtered and raped by the Arab janjaweed posses. The survivers are herded into camps with no santitation, sub-standard shelter (if any) and little food or clean water.

Lack of toilets is just one of many symptoms of greater problems.

It's sickening.

_______
PooperGal
"Searching for the Origin of the Feces"

Charitable Pooper (not verified) -- 11.13.2006

I don't mean to be a grinch, but before donating to projectcure.org (see Pantload post above)or any other non-profit that's not local to your community, please do yourself a favor and look into them a bit.
For instance, for projectcure, you can read the BBB evaluation of this non-profit here.

It's very easy to say "we only have 2% overhead" when you're factoring in non-cash contributions. Take a look at the percentage of cash taken in that's used for payroll, particularly for executive salaries. It's an eye opener, as anyone who recalls the United Way revelations of about 10 years ago will surely tell you.

Want more information about a non-profit's use of your cash donations? Visit the GuideStar web site, log in by creating a user name, and check out their IRS Form 990. This will show you a lot of information about how much cash is being spent on salaries, travel, office rent, etc. Unfortunately, the 990 is always about a year behind actual spending, so it's not going to be up to the minute accurate.

If you're ever in doubt about whether to donate to a "charity" that's soliciting your money, do as I do: Ask the solicitor for a copy of the "charity's" most recent audited financial statement and a list of the compensation of all executives and managers of the organization. Guess how many times they're going to volunteer that information? Based on my experience: not one time. Trust me, I've asked about twenty non-profits for this information and the closest any ever came to offering me information was an invitation to visit their web site.
This is not to say that projectcure.org does not serve a laudable purpose, because clearly its intentions and mission are commendable. But then again, so are those of United Way and AARP, both of which spend money on their management as if they were Fortune 500 companies. I give only to local charities; that is my personal choice, because I've learned by looking at the financial disclosures that an organization that does its good works at a long distance from home is more likely to spend a higher percentage of its cash on management than on the ultimate charitable purpose.
I in no way want you to think this is a negative reflection on Pantload's organization or any other charity for that matter. I only ask that you inform yourself as fully as possible as to where and how your donation will be spent before donating.
If you knew that only 10 cents out of every dollar was going to those who needed it most, would you still give that dollar?

Double Flush (604) -- 11.14.2006

I agree with some of the above--the world desperately needs more toilet management. Instead of throwing more money at it, why not redirect some of the money that countries are spending on hopeless causes? Instead of trying to become better than everybody else on paper, how about taking care of your own people? If you are a leader of one of these countries, use that money for the good of the country and stop being so full of yourself.

_______
[Insert witty banter here]

Anonymous Coward (not verified) -- 02.24.2007

Re: Charities. Write to me and I will send my financial statement. I am the Executive Director and I don't get paid a dime. My assistant gets paid but not from Mountain Fund, he is on the payroll of a real estate company I own. I need a plan for a simple outhouse I need to build at a school in Nepal so if anyone has one, please send in on to me. Thanks

Dave (11657) -- 02.24.2007

Hey Anonymous Coward -- check out the folks at Humanure. I bet they have some ideas as to how to build an outhouse that enables you to reclaim the fertilizer resources all those Nepalese butts will deposit.

MousePoo (150) -- 07.13.2007

A good article. Toilets by people for the people. Tailor-built to their needs and enironment by them so they can continue the process. Does WHO have a program that addresses this? Health needs/Food/drinkable water is all well and good but sanitation needs to be addressed in concert with them.

Post new comment



Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

i poop and i vote

 


About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave | Copyright 2000-2008 PoopReport.com