Well over a year ago, Tydirium read a poop report about a man who met turd terrorism with some
turd terrorism of his own. After a few PoopReporters lauded the man's actions, Tydirium asked:
"Is PoopReport's official dogma 'an eye for an eye, a turd for a turd?' Does turd terrorism justify rectal retaliation? Is vulgar vengeance the only way to respond? What is the official word here?"
A few weeks later (still way back in 2005), Logjam made this comment on a story about paying back an establishment that did not provide bathroom facilities:
"Is a business not having a restroom grounds for turd terrorism? And if it is, are the business's employees fair game? This gets back to the question that Tydirium raised in his comments to last week's story. His question about whether turd terrorism is ever justified requires some serious thought."
So, better late than never, let's discuss. Does turd terrorism justify turd terrorism in return? And does Poop Nazism -- that is, the denial of bathroom facilities -- also justify turd terrorism?
Or can turd terrorism ever be justified at all?