poopreport : Intellectual Crap :


poopdoc 4

If Big Brother Started Watching

Posted 06.06.2008 by MSG (1142)
MSG writes: The essay that follows is, of course, totally fictional and speculative. But it is only a beginning. What I am hoping is that some enterprising writers might continue this story in the comments, taking it in whatever directions you might like.

DATE: 21 Jan 2010
TIME: 9:13 a.m.
PLACE: Committee Hearing Room 311, U. S. Senate
HEARING: Committee on Eating Regulation, pursuant to P.L. 2009-91225a Title II (amended)
PRESIDING: Sen. Slaymaker
PRESENT: Members of the Committee

WITNESS: Joseph A. Nemo, Private Citizen

Sen. Slaymaker: This meeting now called to order, all consenting, no objection, so ruled. Mr. Nemo has kindly consented to return since we ran out of time yesterday. I believe it is Senator Dumas's question time. Madame Senator, if you please.

Sen. Dumas: Thank you, Senator. Mr. Nemo, yesterday you testified as time ran out that, as far as you're concerned, fast foods are a menace, not only to health, but to the environment. Could you explain that, please?

Mr. Nemo: Certainly, Senator Dumba-- ah, Dumas. Everybody knows about fast foods -- or, should I say, junk foods -- and the American diet. Last year's successful prosecution of SuperChips proved that, to say nothing of the Burrito Barn mess.

Sen. Dumas: Yes, indeed, sir, those cases proved beyond a doubt that the American diet, if left to the individual, will deteriorate to utter slime, filth, and gunk. What I'd like to get at, Mr. Nemo, is what diet you, as a private citizen, employ and would recommend instead, and how your diet would improve both health and the environment.

Mr. Nemo: My first concern is poop, Senator. I feed my bowels, you see, so that I poop a lot but wipe a little; nice solid poops from nice solid fiber foods, lots of veggies, and--

Sen. Dumas: Mr. Nemo, I think the U. S. Senate is hardly the place to discuss your bowels.

Mr. Nemo: You asked me, Senator, about environmental considerations. My position is that people who eat fast foods and junk foods produce very low-quality poop: sludgy, soft, gooey, hard to wipe. They use too much paper, clog up the toilets, waste water, you name it. Let me ask you, Senator -- how have your movements been lately? Nice, smooth, just a wipe or two? Or have you had the million-wipers? Any clogs lately?

[Secretary/note-taker notes Sen. Dumas gasping, other Senators snickering.]

Sen. Dumas: Mr. Nemo, really, I am not the one here to answer questions, particularly such as that.

Mr. Nemo: Senator Dumas, you are here as the servant of the people of the United States, of whom I am one. I feel perfectly entitled to ask you questions that can help illustrate my point of view. You are prepared to impose your committee's views on what I should eat, without knowing anything about the effects of what I eat. I'm telling you those effects; I think my question to you is fair. Remember, Senator: Today's feast yields tomorrow's feces; you are what you eat, you poop what you eat, and you wipe what you eat. Like it or not, that influences use of paper, and use of water.

The problem, Senator, is that no two people are alike. My diet might give you uncontrollable diarrhea, or a nasty case of constipation. That's why I asked you what your poops are like, Senator. You might need to improve them.

P Hole (8) -- 06.06.2008

You bring up a decent point MSG. A good solid log that leaves an easily wiped crack does help save water and paper, but I really think that there are easier and more effective ways to go green, and sometimes I think a loose bowel movement is kinda fun too.

The Thunderous ... (741) -- 06.06.2008

I enjoy a good solid BM most of the time. Loose ones destroy the toilet bowl and while fun when they occur they are NO fun to clean up. It would be nice to have a diet that makes it that way for all Americans regardless of race, color or creed.
_______
The Thunderous Crapper 63 Enjoying home toilet advantage since 2004!

Great comment!
BobMcCartyWrites (not verified) -- 06.06.2008

While your site is relatively new to me, I'm confused by the fact that you allow readers to "login" when your site -- and this post in particular -- seems to be more focused upon "logging out."

Bilgepump (2747) -- 06.06.2008

Hehe...I hope Bob sticks around, he has potential!!!
_______

The proper order is kiss me, then go smell the other dog or cat's butt. I cannot stress this enough.

pnuttycorn (456) -- 06.06.2008

Well I'm doomed. ALL I do is loose. Wipe,wipe,wipe,wipe.I am definetly not a green pooper. But I do eat pretty good. And I recycle.

Blind Mullet (534) -- 06.06.2008

Oh, yeah!

"Today's feast yields tomorrow's feces"

I love it! That would make an awesome T-shirt slogan.

Its as good as "Eat big Sunday, Shit big Monday".

Herbert (not verified) -- 06.06.2008

Why do none of my posts get through any more? Did I do something to offend the moderators?

[EDIT:] No.

[SECOND EDIT:] Yes, you're too needlessly and irrelevantly political.

RoboCrap13 (442) -- 06.06.2008

It's like the flash cartoon:
"Food goes in... Poop comes out..."
_______
You have the right to remain Silent but Deadly....

Herbert (not verified) -- 06.07.2008

That's hardly fair. I thought the purpose of moderation was to ensure that explicit sexual/scat and other inappropriate content didn't get through - not to censor views that you don't like.

I find it bizarre that when I was talking about sex, you let my posts through, but now I'm trying to talk about politics (which I thought was allowed). The Shit Volcano, inter alia, has talked about politics on a lot of threads - is there one standard for the PoopReport elite and another for us mere commenters? Or is it just that only certain views are allowed?

daphne (4391) -- 06.07.2008

Don't ask me, Herbert, I wasn't involved with moderating any of your comments today. If you're wondering why your comments didn't get through, though, there IS one difference between you and Shit Volcano that I can see right off the bat. She registered. If you registered, your comments would get through, and they would be more likely to not be deleted.


_______
.....hugging bunnies since 1969
www.daphneszoo.com

Dave (11977) -- 06.07.2008

That's hardly fair. I thought the purpose of moderation was to ensure that explicit sexual/scat and other inappropriate content didn't get through - not to censor views that you don't like.

Any blatantly political content of any ideology is censored from PoopReport. Why? Because otherwise every thread devolves into childish namecalling; the censorship is necessary to ensure the conversation stays focused on that which is really important.

daphne (4391) -- 06.07.2008

Poop.

Coming to a toilet near you.

Importantly.


_______
.....hugging bunnies since 1969
www.daphneszoo.com

Bilgepump (2747) -- 06.07.2008

Herbie, I have approved every comment of yours I come across, and usually follow it with some smart ass remark. I like ya, really, your naivety is refreshing most of the time, and infuriating once in a great while. Daphne's right, if you want to avoid waiting for a mod to approve your comments, register. You post often enough that there is no reason not to. And please keep in mind that this is Poopreport, first and foremost, and thats primarily what we discuss, but invariably, comments tend to derail, and some devolve into just what Dave described, and therefore serve no purpose other than to cause ill will (I am as guilty as anyone at this transgression). The whole purpose of the site, as I understand it, is to promote the universal equality that pooping brings to the world. (jeezuz, did I say that?)
_______

The proper order is kiss me, then go smell the other dog or cat's butt. I cannot stress this enough.

Herbert (not verified) -- 06.07.2008

Fair enough, I guess you have a point; I do know this site isn't about politics, and I shouldn't have gone to such great lengths to try and provoke a political argument. So I apologise to Dave and others. I'll try and be less political in future.

I do find it odd, though, that my posts relating to sex and virginity (which were only tangentially related to poop) were always approved, while the political ones weren't.

Bilgepump (2747) -- 06.07.2008

see? there ya go, approved, just as soon as I saw it.
_______

The proper order is kiss me, then go smell the other dog or cat's butt. I cannot stress this enough.

baron von crapalot (649) -- 06.07.2008


Herb, moderating is done on a 'best endeavour' basis. C'mon man, this site is for fun... dive in and enjoy this shit, take a few intellectual punches on the nose (we all do!)_______
Did I just fart?.... Oh shit! NO!!

MSG (1142) -- 06.07.2008

I'm still hoping someone will take the conversation with Citizen Nemo in some new and more absurd direction. My point was that, with so many people wanting to control or tax everything we do, can eating and pooping be far behind? What will the Committee do?

prarie doggin (3866) -- 06.07.2008

Herbert, why not register and become our political poop reporter. Follow the campaign trail by describing the turds of the candidates, such as Hillary's shriveled, dejected turds slowly going head first down the drain, being flushed by Bill's tears. You can get in your political satire and shouldn't be censored. Get creative, it appears you have the talent.

Herbert (not verified) -- 06.07.2008

Sadly, I have little or no expertise in the matter of political candidates' bowel habits. And as much as you insist that ladies do, in fact, defecate, I really can't imagine Hillary pooping. Bill, on the other hand...

I imagine that Mike Huckabee would probably be a good PoopReporter. Given that he lost a third of his weight on a crash diet when he was Governor of Arkansas, his bowel habits must undoubtedly have been affected. And we know he has a sense of humour (as evidenced by his admission that he used to deep-fry squirrels in a popcorn popper during his undergraduate years).

(Good God, I can't believe I'm actually thinking about this. PoopReport has been a bad influence on me.)

daphne (4391) -- 06.07.2008

MSG, I want to contribute to your story, but I'm not too good with the political thing. I'm going to try later. This is the first time I've ever felt bad about derailing, MSG. I'm sorry!


_______
.....hugging bunnies since 1969
www.daphneszoo.com

MSG (1142) -- 06.07.2008

Thanks, Daphne, I appreciate it. I'm not thinking of this story so much as a political thing as a potentially embarrassing conversation between someone who wants to talk about poop and someone who doesn't (but might become interested in spite of herself). And then there are the other senators present, with names to be made up . . . it's just made-up but prominent people who poop and are being forced to think about it--in public. Entertainment.

daphne (4391) -- 06.08.2008

....Senator Slaymaker chokes on the last swill of bourbon that he'd hidden in his Juicy Juice *100 percent juice!* sippy carton at the last remark.....

Sen Slaymaker: Mr. Nemo, I would assume if her bowel movements are anything like her proposals, they are weak and make little spash.

.....Senator Dumas shoots a dirty look at Senator Slaymaker and then sticks out her tongue...


_______
.....hugging bunnies since 1969
www.daphneszoo.com

The Shit Volcano (3817) -- 06.09.2008

Again, MSG, I am not too good with these sorts of things. However, I found myself snickering comparing your fictional conversation to those argued on the floor during the political convention I recently attended in Reno. I could only imagine a debate on shit bills with the good people of Nevada.

"Does anyone second the proposal to store bullshit at Yucca Mounta...."

"Objection, Mr. Speaker. I object! I use my bullshit every day in my backyard. It's highway robbery to think you can just come onto my property to steal my shit pile! I fed my bull for days..."

"With these prices, who can afford to burn anything but bullshit!"

"Excuse me, we were speaking to mike two!"

"But..."

"Mike number two!"

"Thank you, Mr. Speaker! As I was saying..."

_______
Well, you don't actually blow on it. That's just an expression.

KnuxTheFox (24) -- 07.22.2008

Sen. Richard Johnson, PA (made up): I feel Mr. Nemo has a valid point. Our eating habits have made for a less than economical environment. Is there anything in the citizen privacy act that says that we can't conduct a nationwide survey to determine the average quality of output by our nations citizens? This would bring the statistics that Mr. Nemo is seeking, would it not? I'm all for improving the quality of our nation, and it is evident that we must start by improving the quality of the food we eat, everyday...and incidentally putting out the next day. Sen. Dumas, do you oppose?


_______
See that poo? That's MY poo! This is MY territory! Ha ha! So...go sniff around somewhere else, you dumb dog.

Thomas Crapper/Pepto-Bismo (not verified) -- 08.02.2008

To the mod who approved any of my messages: Still deciding on the name, stop making me play mind games with myself, darnit! to anybody who responds to this, I highly dislike the nickname "Insane Poster"

It does raise a valid question. Fast food makes for a many-wiper...
Totally different: crapped in wal-mart. At least a foot and a half long, 4 inches long. The super-flush could not blast it to pieces. Water parted like a rock in a river around it.
I pity the poor soul who had to clean it up/look at it.

LeandraCullen (913) -- 08.11.2008

This is a good fictional story, it's rare to find good fictional stories about shit on any site
_______
I will never shit somewhere that only has that horrible, scratchy brand of toilet paper. That stuff sucks!

The Shit Volcano (3817) -- 08.12.2008

But I've written many a shitty fictional story. Does that count, even if it wasn't on this site?

_______
Well, you don't actually blow on it. That's just an expression.

LeandraCullen (913) -- 08.12.2008

What site(s) were they on? May I read them? I have an idea, maybe in that little bar with all the dif. catagories, there should be one for fiction.
_______
I will never shit somewhere that only has that horrible, scratchy brand of toilet paper. That stuff sucks!

loaf pincher (118) -- 11.17.2008

Unfortunately this exact thing may come to be in the near future as the government needs more money new taxes will be created. Everyone should come together on this site to help build the toilet of the future.To meet proper government standards though it will need to be capable of the following things (all of which would have to be wirelessly transmitted to the irs for collection at the end of the year)
1. ounces of water used
2. sheets of toilet paper used
3. be able to detect a soild , semi solid or liquid shit and how much was deposited.
this new shitter would have so many sensors on it it could detect how many ass hairs you have. each time you use it it will send a nifty little data package to the irs and at the end of the year when you file taxes this would be added to your tax liability amount.Now of course we all know it will take years of hearings just like above and millions of tax dollars just to get the ball rolling so why not start now and have an invention in place already?

athenivanidx (104) -- 10.02.2009

Well........if the government starts taxing us for our shitting and eating habits.........the lawmakers who came up with that crap are gonna have to pay it too.......and I don't think they'd be too thrilled about that so, I doubt this will happen.

A better title for this, IMHO, would have been "Big Shitter Watching Us" because........some of us think the government is a big shitter.....I don't, but I know that others doo.

Good fictionwriting though, MSG. Entertaining as hell.....and kind of creepy too because even though I don't believe it will happen......if it ever did.......man oh man.

The Integral


_______
We three shits of Mathematica are. Laughing on the toilet, har, har!

MSG (1142) -- 10.03.2009

Until recently, I had forgotten having written this story; however, recent trends in our government have brought it back to mind. The Feds are--I was about to say "insinuating" but will use a more accurate word--forcing themselves into more and more aspects of our private lives, and the takeover of health care seems all to imminent to me, to say nothing of the environment-related bullcrap. I am sorry to say that my little scenario is a lot closer to reality now than when I wrote it--only I doubt the govt will actually be asking the advice of anybody as knowledgeable as Mr. Nemo. The recent threads on toilet paper here on PR: wait till the feds regulate that! The food nazis are already in full cry, and January 2010 is not far off. Let's see how close my prediction comes . . .

ChiefThunderbutt (2712) -- 10.03.2009

The government already controls my health care and they do a stellar job. The VA health care system was very disreputable a decade ago but under new management concepts it has been streamlined into one of the best systems in America. It operates along similar lines as the NHS in the UK. The approval rating of those of us who receive our health care through the VA is over 80%.

The government also does a great job with Medicare, this medical system that takes care of the oldest and sickest of our citizens uses less than 5% of its resources on administration costs whereas the major insurance companies use 11% to 30%.

My son works in cancer research in California and tells me that the major obstruction he faces in treating patients is Blue Cross Blue Shield of California who turn down treatment requests in over half of all submitted cases. One lady was turned down for treatment of her skin cancer because she had been treated for acne so the cancer was considered a pre-existing condition. Treatment was eventually authorized but only after a time consuming battle which, since time is money, only helped drive medical costs even higher.

We band together and form governments for our mutual protection, the alternative is anarchy.


_______
Eat chilies and feel the burn!!

Blind Mullet (534) -- 10.03.2009

Acne means cancer is a pre-existing condition?!?!?!?!
Holy shit- I've had face-cancer since high school and nobody told me?!?!?!

_______
The white zone is for loading and unloading only- FZ.

ChiefThunderbutt (2712) -- 10.03.2009

Actually BM acne has nothing to do with skin cancer but, unfortunately, many American insurance companies will try everything in their power to avoid paying a claim. They like to keep the money for executive bonuses.


_______
Eat chilies and feel the burn!!

Post new comment



Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

*

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

JOAP drip 3



About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave
Copyright 2000-2009 by PoopReport.com. All content is meant to entertain, not offend. Hope you enjoyed it.