poopreport : Intellectual Crap :

Poop Culture: A Review

Posted 05.04.2007 by The Big Wiper (2234)
Editor's note: I know what you're thinking. "Dave probably edited out anything negative in this review." And you're right -- I'm not sure if I could have resisted the temptation. So this piece was edited not by me but by Bunga Din. The below represents the author's opinion -- I didn't make any changes.


In 1999, Dave Praeger founded his cyber (ad)venture known as PoopReport. Comfortably seated upon his editorial throne eight years later, Praeger now offers his crowning intellectual achievement to date: Poop Culture: How America is Shaped by its Grossest National Product (Feral House, 2007, 232 pages, $14.95).

As a regular contributor to the site, I needed no introduction to the concept of this substantive and well-researched treatise on the role poop plays in today's culture, and the conflicting attitudes swirling all around it.

Praeger opens his historical and cultural presentation with one of the most compelling hooks I've ever encountered in a published work, fiction or non-fiction. I quote: "With enviable ease, poop slid out of the mechanical anus and onto the conveyor belt below." Science fiction, you say? No -- the end result of Belgian artist Wim Delvoye's Cloaca: New & Improved, a "thirty-five-foot long steel and glass technological replica of the human digestive system that functions just like yours."

Pictures of Cloaca and details of how it processes food into poop provide an entertaining and memorable opening for what proves to be a superbly documented journey into a subject that is at once as deep and dark as a cesspit, but well-deserving of airing out in the light of day. "Five thousand years of history records the struggle of people and governments against ever-higher mountains of poop," Praeger declares. In the preceding pages, he thoroughly documents the evolution of waste disposal from the days of the earliest human food-gatherers who just let the stuff lie around, thus inviting disease; through cesspits and privies; and finally to a sewer-system infrastructure and the beginnings of the flush toilet we know and use today.

Praeger then demonstrates his penchant for playfulness when he segues effortlessly into a clever recasting of the Biblical story of Adam and Eve, using poop and shameful shitting -- rather than a bite from the apple of the Tree of Knowledge -- as a metaphor. "Twenty-four hours out of the Garden, Adam and Eve were humanity's first shameful shitters," he advises us. This leads inevitably to the introduction of the Victorian mores which tirelessly promoted the concept of shame regarding bodily functions and which inculcated reluctance to use public toilets. It is no exaggeration to say that those shameful attitudes and behaviors persist today amongst a generous percentage of the human population, though varying from culture to culture. Says Praeger, "Only when we understand the toilet as a sanitary, not ideological, apparatus, and poop as a physical, not moral, threat, will society be freed from the tyranny of the bowel."

A significant discussion of the origins of that profound sense of shame ensues, covering such topics as improper toilet training, fears of vulnerability while using the toilet, mysophobia (fear of germs), early psychological trauma, and the checkered proposition -- replete with bullies and lack of privacy -- that constitutes school bathrooms. All of this material is offered with a certain clinical, yet evangelical, bent, encouraging the reader to rethink his or her positions and join what Praeger calls "the Brown Revolution".

Praeger also offers both historical perspectives on the subject itself and practical suggestions on the actual procedures. Diagrams demonstrate the pinching effect on the rectum of straining while seated conventionally on the toilet versus the relaxed, natural squatting postures that were utilized by our food-gathering ancestors. They would certainly have regarded porcelain as worshipfully as the apes gathered around the monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey. A myriad of other rarely-discussed topics such as wiping techniques, toilet paper choices, and public bathroom etiquette are presented as openly and helpfully as a housewife conducting a Tupperware party. Normalizing the discussion of bodily functions in the popular culture is very much a stated goal of this book, and the thoughtful narrative everywhere reinforces that objective successfully with nary a hint of sensationalism.

Speaking of popular culture, Poop Culture documents the increasing frequency of the inclusion of pooping scenes in modern cinema, referencing the mundane approaches used in Fight Club and American Splendor, in which Ed Norton's character and Harvey Pekar are both shown reading catalogues and letters on the toilet. Decades ago, even the mention of women being pregnant or a couple sharing the same bed (such as Lucy and Ricky Ricardo on I Love Lucy) was verboten. Both television and the movie industry meticulously avoided depictions of bodily functions and graphic sexuality in general for decades, and even mentions were rare. Today, Hollywood and cutting-edge visual and performance artists alike can routinely engage in a no-holds barred approach to sexuality, language and now, finally, depiction of bodily functions in their work.

Poop Culture offers illustrations of some of the most controversial artworks, including Santa Chocolate Shop by Paul McCarthy, Shit Faith by Gilbert and George, and, most notably, Piero Manzoni's exhibit of ninety cans of his own poop in an art gallery in Albisola, Italy, in 1961. The popularity of such TV shows as the scatologically-liberated animated series South Park also illustrates that at least part of our American culture is amenable to leaving doo-doo behind as a no-no (Mr. Hankey, of course, is a large, talking turd full of satirical sarcasm and not just kernels of corn). As Praeger suggests: "Mr. Hankey is poop that is redemptive... he is poop, but he is not negative.

Poop Culture later invokes literary and religious arguments as it moves toward its measured, Utopia-envisioning conclusion. The not-so-heavily-veiled satire of Gulliver's Travels is referenced, pointing out that "for three hundred years, critics have derided Swift's 'excremental vision', describing his poetry and prose as 'an extreme of vulgarity and obscenity' {...} Aldous Huxley accused him of having a 'hatred of the bowels.' Such criticism, of course, directly complies with civilization's mandate to reject poop."

And then there are the ultimate religious questions the book poses: "Christians believe that God created man in His image; and while that does not necessarily mean that God poops, He at least is responsible for our doing so. Why do we find uncivilized the bodily functions that He created in us? Do we believe that He created us in an unacceptable manner?"

Praeger's visionary parting shot is one that summarizes his great attention to detail and passion in chronicling the progression of attitudes toward bodily functions, techniques and waste disposal throughout recorded history in this volume. "The next step is to rehabilitate the Victorian infrastructure with the Galenic outlook: to apply our enlightened society to the betterment of the manifestations of poop. To improve the infrastructure as we abandon its ideology for a new one in which pooping is not a filthy act, but a cleansing ritual. You enter the bathroom with the impurities of your body gathered in your rectum, you poop those impurities out, and you exit the bathroom at your cleanest, purest and most civilized. Pooping as a cleansing ritual: this is the truly the triumph of the carnivalesque."

In this his first major work offered for national consumption, Dave Praeger has effectively argued his case for bringing pooping out of the closet and elevating it to mainstream discussion status that is both healthy and enlightening.

  • Learn more at PoopTheBook.com
  • Buy Poop Culture on Amazon
  • doniker (1491) -- 05.04.2007

    I just skimmed the above review but I really don't see it as an honest evaluation of the book.
    I would like to see non-bias reviews of the book from people that have never heard of PoopReport.com.

    I have read some of the book and it is great. It is extremely well written and fascinating.

    But I have been involved in this Poop Thing for along time. I respect and like dave and his writing, so my opinion is bias.
    dave has done so much for me over the years and has provided endless hours of entertainment....how could I say anything bad about the book?

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.04.2007

    There are likely to be reviews of the book from people who have never heard of PR on amazon eventually.

    You 'skimmed' the review and don't find it honest? It's certainly my honest, intellectual evaluation. I'm a writer by profession, and I know what makes a book flow.

    Dave could easily have turned this into a dry, thesis-like tome, but it's an easy read with just the right amount of pop culture to counterbalance the significant historical input.

    I'm wondering why you feel that someone must say something 'bad' about a book in order for it to be considered 'non-bias(ed.)' Note the spelling of the word.

    As a writer who has been reviewed and read many reviews of my fellow writers, there is indeed a segment of critics who feel it is their duty to take digs rather than evaluate objectively, even if there is nothing there to criticize.

    It's certainly possible that someone that doesn't understand Dave's ojective here would slash the book, using the 'too much information' justification. But they would be indulging something PR works against constantly.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    Dave (11451) -- 05.04.2007

    Doniker: here's a review from the Baltimore City Paper.

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.04.2007

    A very thoughtful review. The writer 'gets it.' This is a good sign. Reviews like this will pull in mainstream readers.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    doniker (1491) -- 05.04.2007

    I understand your point TBW.

    But I feel that dave wrote this book to show the world the great talent that he has.

    You, me and all the regulars on this site know what dave is capable of and understand what poopreport is all about.

    If we didn't enjoy it we wouldn't be here.

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.04.2007

    I can tell you that if Dave-O continues to get reviews like the one he got from the Baltimore paper, he'll make some noise with this book.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    Bunga Din (1237) -- 05.04.2007

    I believe it was a great review/precise of the book. I had yet to read it but I think based on Wipers review he covered all the bases and reviewed it from a perspective of someone with an open mind, something few critics usually do.

    Wiper said "As a writer who has been reviewed and read many reviews of my fellow writers, there is indeed a segment of critics who feel it is their duty to take digs rather than evaluate objectively, even if there is nothing there to criticize." Maybe next time doniker would be happy if a young Dominique Francon wrote the review.

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.04.2007

    Oh, my. Dominique in one of her moods. Now there's a force to be reckoned with!

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    DungDaddy (1341) -- 05.04.2007

    Well, now that I got the Cliff's Notes, I won't need to buy the book.

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.04.2007

    Now, now. I know you'll want to be ready for any poop quiz that comes your way.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    daphne (3202) -- 05.05.2007

    I just finished the book last night, and one thing that I noticed about it was that it started out easy to read and topical. Then, I found myself reading it slower and slower because the material was downright heavy.

    Heavy man.

    Like a flushing toilet, this book brought me to some pretty deep concepts about poop, narrowing in again and again on specific things that bolstered the Dave Man's arguements. I liked it very much and know that I'm going to to have to read it again in the near future to reinforce everything that I may forget.

    One comment - I was surprised that the Dirty Protest wasn't mentioned in the section about poop as a last resort to communicate or show defiance. I thought for sure this was a prime example of the topic at hand.

    All in all, I loved it.

    Dave, you're a rather well-read man about the stinky.


    _______
    .....hugging bunnies since 1969
    www.daphneszoo.com

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.05.2007

    daph, there are so many detailed arguments and categories that Dave-O creates as he moves through his book. I can tell you that choosing what to leave out in the review was difficult for me.

    But a good reviewer can entice others to take a look at a book by highlighting the most intriguing things. In one sense I realize I didn't do Dave-O justice by having to be selective about the many points made.

    This book is intellectually dense--as in full of content--not the other meaning. It has some of the qualities of a supplemental text for a college course.

    All good.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    Toots N. McCrack (160) -- 05.05.2007

    Hey, TBW, great minds think alike! Here's a bit of the email I sent to Dave last week after reading the book straight through:

    ""It was really, really wonderfully written and captivating. I'm not just sucking up or stroking your ego (although if that's a side effect, all the better ;). It was very intelligently put together yet I could hear your voice and humor shine through-- a great balance. Great job!

    As I read it, I was forcibly reminded of my college days. This is EXACTLY the kind of thing that would be required reading in the kinds of courses I took (if not the entire book, chapters of it would and will undoubtedly make it into "readers", copied articles to accompany text books). Not that poop was ever really on the agenda, but I could see this becoming part of a curriculum of a psych or sociology class dealing with unspoken taboos, body image or historical societal contructs that haven't been thouroughly examined yet. I feel like calling up UCSC and asking my old psych dept. if they have considered incorporating your masterpiece yet.""

    _______
    'Hey that sounds pretty nasty, how about a courtesy flush over there?' (AP1)

    daphne (3202) -- 05.06.2007

    Hey Wiper, I wasn't talking about your review as far as the Dirty Protest was mentioned. I meant that I expected to read about it in Dave's book.


    _______
    .....hugging bunnies since 1969
    www.daphneszoo.com

    The Big Wiper (2234) -- 05.09.2007

    daph, I knew what you meant. But I really did have a problem eliminating (ha!) things to mention in the review since there was so much there.

    Pulling My Pants Down For Peace, Plop and Posterity!

    Turdle Dove (82) -- 05.10.2007

    I plan on buying the book as soon as my work study aid comes in. I'm psyched to read it!

    Post new comment



    Prove you're not a spambot: what bodily function is this site about? Four letters, begins with p...

    The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

    *

    • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
    • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
    20,000 character limit / Flood control: 60 seconds between comments and no more than 10 comments per hour

    oxypowder

     


    About PoopReport | Advertise! | The PoopReport Press Room | Report Your Poop | Contact Dave | Copyright 2000-2007 PoopReport.com