by Pooperscooper on Jun 29 2003 9:40 am
I like:
Poop stories that are factual--truth really is stranger than fiction, anyway. Besides, telling tall tales is often a way of bragging and serving our pretensions. Real poop stories are fascinating and powerful because they challenge our pretensions and strip off our masks. Poop is one of the few things, like death that and birth that we all have in common--it undercuts gender, class, ethnicity, political affiliations, religious belief. Poop and pooping are subversive! We are not supposed to be interested in it. Out of control pooping threatens our sense of our selves as adults. Our terror is to wind up in diapers again. The most powerful, dignified head of state wants us all to forget that he or she poops.
When I was 4 years old and on a walk with my dad, I saw him flirting with a gorgeous blonde. I didnt like this. Right at a delicate moment, I sabotaged the whole thing by piping up, 'My Poppa poops.' Totally killed the mood!
What I like on Poopreport
Stories that give the whole context of the poop experience--the people involved, their attitudes, locale. Context matters when it comes to poop
Curiosity, both social and intellectual. Its one thing to read about poop, but it becomes fascinating when the person wonders why it happened, why certain people are embarrassed and others are not, etc.
Poop stories that tie seemingly incompatible subjects together (poop and religion, poop and romance, etc.)
As I put it to Dave what I like about PR.com is that we are a salon, a place where we can play with our experiences of poop, play with the ideas that come up.
PR is a place where we remain adult, but go places where adults supposedly do not go--talking and thinking about poop and pooping. We are exploring one of society's forbidden zones.
We are a community of fellow explorers. I have been struck by how much we care about each other--and that we take note and feel concerned when one of our regulars has not posted in awhile. I think that is rare.
I have told a number of people 'Poopreport.com is helpful. We are ribald and we are earthy, but we are not nasty and not fetishy.' There's a quality here that I would consider gentlemanly, yet earthy. A frankness combined with a radical sense of fair play. Kind of like Joe Bob Briggs. Ive often said, 'Poopreport is for good ole boys--of both genders.'
Sexuality is interesting here. I think Poopreport is best when we focus on the relationship as the context for pooping. If pooping is fetishized, it is no longer a subject in its own right, but becomes subordindated to the quest for erotic gratification. The focus shifts from poop and pooping to getting one's lust satisified, and there's no curiousity about poop for its own sake and PR.com risks losing its identity.
I am not a scholar of fetishism, but my hunch is fetishism gets its energy by focusing selectively and intensively on just one thing, (eg poop) for the purpose of getting turned on. Poop and pooping are made to serve as means to and end.
But to appreciate and explore poop and pooping, you cannot fetishize them. Instead you have to at all aspects of poop and pooping, for its own sake and look for sexual gratification on other sites that have an erotic agenda.
Poop report's agenda is social-intellectual-playful and we stay curious. We dont eroticize, because we are a SALON, a brokerage place for ideas and stories, not a fetish site.
Our motto, should (with a nod to Oscar Wilde) be 'Poop for Poops Sake', rather than 'Poop for the Sake of Getting Turned On.'
At least, that's my two cents.
What I do not like is:
Nastiness for its own sake. Thats emotional vandalism. And its immature.
Voyeurism--The voyeur hides, never reveals him/herself, but exploits other people's openness. PR.com is a community--and, in some ways a band of explorers. Voyeurism destroyes community because the voyeur exploits the vitality and openness of the community while refusing to join that community.
Pooperscooper