First of all, I think it was a poor decision on the part of the author, Terje, to write "stupid American system". That detail was entirely unimportant to the plot of this PoopReport.

This author knew he was writing for a primarily American audience or he wouldn't have even included that detail. I don't think you can be surprised that people were insulted.

Personally, it didn't bother me, but I wouldn't go on a Swedish-based website, insult that country and not expect reprecussions. This is not a justification for the crude insults made against this Poop Reporter, all I'm saying is, "How did you expect people to react?".

With that out of the way, I thought this was a funny Poop Report. I was laughing at the part where the couple were, in a way, strengthening their marriage through their battle against diarrhea.

My only concern is the medicine given to this Poop Reporter by the doctor. It seemed like he was completely knocked out by the drugs. What diagnosis did the doctor make? What kind of diarrhea medication involves injection? How could this doctor have over looked a seemingly normal case of international shits for something requiring that type of attention.

Thats just a few things on my mind.

BTW, Shat-man-do, its the Swiss who are neutral, not the Swedish.

I think the real issue with this person is not so much the consumption of feces, considering he admits to only licking the feces off his fingers, but rather his supression of bowel movements. I could see this as an extension of two things:
1)Some form of self-destructive behavior in which this person is denying himself a bowel movement in order to punish himself for whatever reason, and thus the licking of the feces is a further punishment for having a BM,
2) It could be sexual, this guy enjoys the pressure in the bowels that comes along with the feeling of having to take a huge dump, and the lickin of the feces is a further extension of the indulgence in fecalphilia.
Just from what I've read in original question, I sort of have a feeling that a third option for this could be,
3) He's lying about the whole thing.
While I'm sure every aspect of this story could be entirely true, and probably not as rare as we think, I think its reasonable to also address the honesty behind this story.
1.a. He could be exaggerating all of this, its a behavior that he did as a child often, was severely punished for it perhaps, and has felt life long guilt and embarrassment about it. As an extension of that repressed guilt, he has subsquently brought it back into context in his adult life, telling friends about this behavior in an attempt to induce the same reaction that his own parents had before him, shock, disgust, angry, and reprimanding.
1.b. This story never happened to him and he made it for whatever reason people make up stuff like this. The reason I am even contemplating this clue is because he says "I haven't done it in 2 years though." I've talked to a lot of liars in my lifetime, and I've found whenever one of them tells an unusual story, one of the first responses they'll get after the tellin is, "So show me" or " Prove it", and thus to compensate and eliminate the need to justify their story, they will also further lie, "oh I don't have it anymore" or "Its been a while since I done it, so I doubt I can now" or something along this nature. This puts a barrier between them and their story that will prevent them from having to "prove it", thus preventing a total collapse of their story from it being disproved.
But I don't know this guy, and only know things about him from what the question says, so who knows.