This article brings to mind a certain French feminist called Julia Kristeva and her, frankly bizarre and, astonishingly reductive theories on women and fluid mechanics. She argues that because fluid mechanics involves fluidity (no sh*t sherlock), it is thus sexist. She goes on to declare that 'E=mc2' is inherently sexist because of it's privileging of the male. To reduce a woman to her most basic (although admittedly most humorous) of functions IS undoubtably to miss the entire point of the feminist struggle!! To do this only enhances the binary oppositional dualisms at work in gender identity. Hence, I am not convinced by snow pea's analysis of her poop story. And even less convinced by her claims of feminism. Perhaps less radical, more liberal feminist if you want to stick a sh*tty label on it. So there. Phew! Sorry, just had to get that off my chest. Good story though, just not sure about the deconstruction of it...

_______
Keep on Poopin'/Poppin' (delete as appropriate)